header-logo header-logo

All or nothing

28 January 2010 / Eleanor Morgan , Willie Manners
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

When should administrators pay the rent? by Willie Manners & Eleanor Morgan

At the end of last year, the High Court handed down its decision in Goldacre (Offices) Limited v Nortel Networks UK Limited (in administration) [2009] EWHC 3389 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 54 (Jan). The court had to consider what payment was due in respect of rent where the administrator had used a small part of premises let to a company in administration.

Following Re ABC Coupler and Engineering Co (No 3) [1970] 1WLR 702, it is well established that if an administrator occupies an insolvent company’s premises for the conduct of the administration, this use is for the benefit of the insolvent company’s creditors and any rent falling due after the date of the winding up order will be payable as an expense of the administration during the period of such use.

Rent will, therefore, be paid by the administrator from the assets of the company before paying preferential creditors, creditors with floating charges or unsecured creditors. In practical

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll