header-logo header-logo

17 April 2019
Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

All change on the farm

Agricultural tenants and landowners face far-reaching changes to the law on mortgages, repossession, apply to vary clauses and passing on tenancies to the next generation.

Defra published a consultation paper this month on ‘Reforming agricultural tenancies in England and Wales’, due to end on 2 July. It asks whether current restrictions on agricultural mortgages act as a barrier to letting farmland, and whether farmers unable to meet their repayments should be given greater protection against repossession.

Sarah Denney-Richards, head of agriculture at Thursfields, said: ‘Agricultural tenants and landowners need to be aware of these potential changes and the impact they could have.

‘Anyone who is concerned about the potential impact on their business and livelihood should take professional advice and ensure they monitor any changes that come into law.’

Key proposals include allowing Agricultural Holdings Act tenants to assign their tenancy for payment to a third party, subject to a landlord’s right both to buy out the tenant at the time and to end the new arrangement after 25 years.

The minimum age of 65 years for succession on retirement applications would be abolished, to encourage earlier retirement and succession planning. There would be a new dispute resolution mechanism for disputes concerning apply to vary clauses, where either party believes they present an ‘unreasonable barrier’ to land improvement or business development.

The consultation proposes extending the category of persons entitled to apply for succession to include cohabitees, nieces, nephews and grandchildren. It also suggests removing the ‘commercial unit test’ which prevents an applicant who already farms a commercial farm from applying to take a succession tenancy on.

Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll