header-logo header-logo

01 March 2023
Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

All change in Northern Ireland?

Lawyers have been combing through the fine detail of the Windsor Framework, an agreement in principle on amending the Northern Ireland Protocol.

The government has scrapped the controversial Northern Ireland Protocol Bill as there is now ‘no legal justification’ for it. The EU will therefore drop the legal actions it launched against the UK over the Bill.

The framework, announced by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen this week, restricts the application of EU rules to the ‘minimum necessary’ so that less than 3% will be applicable. The oversight of the European Court of Justice is retained for matters of EU law only.

UK VAT and excise rules will now apply for alcoholic drinks for immediate consumption and immovable goods, whereas EU VAT rules could be applied under the Northern Ireland Protocol. However, EU VAT will still apply to other items.

A ‘Stormont brake’ is introduced, under which the Northern Ireland Assembly can oppose new EU goods rules that would have ‘significant and lasting effects’ on the people of Northern Ireland. In order to trigger the brake, the support of 30 members from at least two parties is required.

Bureaucracy on trade will be reduced through the use of a green lane and red lane, the former being used to fast-track goods intended to stay in Northern Ireland by removing customs checks and certifications. With a supermarket truck having to provide 500 certificates under the Northern Ireland Protocol, it can now simply make a declaration that the goods will stay in Northern Ireland. The red lane will be used for goods intended to enter the EU.

The same medicines with the same labels will be available across the UK, without the barcode scanning requirements of the Protocol. Similarly, the framework ends the restrictions on movement of seed potatoes, oak trees and other plants between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.

Sunak said the agreement was ‘written in the language of laws and treaties. But really, it’s about much more than that. It’s about stability in Northern Ireland. It’s about real people and real businesses.’

Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , EU , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll