header-logo header-logo

03 April 2019
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

All change as Brexit rolls on

Brexit has made MPs more assertive, undermined the prime minister’s authority and placed the devolution settlement under threat, a report by an independent think tank has found.

The Institute for Government report, ‘The Brexit effect’, published last week, assesses the impact of Brexit. It finds that key departments such as Defra and the Home Office are bigger now than they have been at any point in the last decade, as more staff have been drafted in to deal with Brexit, but existing work has been put on hold to deal with the UK’s departure.

Ministerial resignations have become commonplace while MPs have banded together and traditional party discipline has buckled, the report found, with more Commons votes decided by a margin of less than 1% in this Parliamentary session than in the previous 10 years.

Meanwhile, the devolved administrations have felt side-lined for much of the Brexit process, exposing fundamental problems with the 20-year-old settlement. Tensions could rise further when decisions are made on how to reallocate EU powers and funding.

Far from former Prime Minister David Cameron’s ‘bonfire of the quangos’, the report finds that at least three quangos are guaranteed and many more are expanding. Finally, according to the report, any financial benefit gained as the UK stops paying into the EU budgets is likely to be overshadowed by the economic impact of leaving.

Bronwen Maddox, director at the Institute for Government, said: ‘Brexit will have an enduring effect on our government, whatever the outcome.

‘It has fundamentally changed the shape of the civil service, the functioning of Parliament and how government operates. Thirty-three months since the EU Referendum, the Brexit effect on government is considerable and far from over.’

Issue: 7835 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll