header-logo header-logo

16 February 2022
Issue: 7967 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

All about client reputation

Lawyers aim to ensure client’s reputation doesn’t precede them

Digital media, growth in class actions and a rise in cross-border disputes has made protection of a client’s reputation increasingly important, lawyers believe. Yet the use of specialist public relations (PR) consultants remains low.

Three-fifths of respondents said they consider reputational impact when advising clients and more than three-quarters agreed litigation PR is necessary in a client’s legal strategy, in a Byfield Consultancy survey of corporate counsel, law firm partners, silks, litigation funders and public relations (PR) advisors. However, only eight per cent said they always involve external PR consultants when advising clients.

Byfield highlights in its report, Finding the right line: litigation PR in an evolving dispute ecosystem, published last week that while reputation has always been an important consideration during litigation, several factors are increasing demand. These include the growth in class actions, the speed of news stories in the digital media era and the increasing volume of cross-border disputes, where ‘it is key for litigators, clients and PR advisers to be familiar with the nuances in media culture, litigation practices, reporting restrictions and PR approaches across several jurisdictions’.

Most of the respondents also agreed environmental, social and governance (ESG) will be a dominant theme in future disputes, which adds an extra layer of reputational risk as non-ethical conduct will play out on a public stage, affecting a business’s ability to acquire investment and talent.

While the litigation PR sector is well established in ‘litigious societies’ such as New York, this is not the case in areas newer to dispute resolution, such as Dubai, where clients and the press are more conservative.

Gus Sellito, co-founder of Byfield Consultancy, said: ‘With the increase of media interest, particularly in areas of conduct and ESG, companies and others who are involved in disputes will need to manage the narrative around these “clickbait” issues. Litigation PR will be more important than ever as these issues begin to take centre stage.’

Issue: 7967 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll