header-logo header-logo

Airlines must compensate for lightning strike delays

19 January 2016
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

When lightning strikes cause delays, airlines may have to compensate passengers, the High Court has held, in a case that potentially could lead to 54,000 individual claims.

In Evans v Monarch Airlines Ltd at Reading County Court on 14 January (unreported), Judge Melissa Clarke held that lightning strikes are not one of the “extraordinary circumstances” that excuse airlines from paying flight delay compensation. She awarded the passengers €600 (£450) each for a five hour flight delay.

Under European Flight Delay Regulation EC 261/2004, passengers delayed by three hours or more in the last six years can claim up to €600 compensation, as long as the delay was not caused by extraordinary circumstances. The regulation does not define the term, "extraordinary circumstances".

Bott & Co Solicitors, who acted for Michael Evans, say the ruling could benefit 54,000 delayed passengers, totalling £17.6m in flight delay compensation. This calculation is based on Civil Aviation Authority statistics that 13.5 million passengers in the past six years were delayed for three hours or more, 80% can potentially lead to claims, and 0.5% of delays are caused by lightning.

While the decision is not legally binding, the firm points out that it “is the lead case on the issue of lightning strikes. As such, the decision will be highly persuasive in flight delay cases involving lightning in English and Welsh courts”.

Kevin Clarke, litigation executive at Bott & Co, says: “Bad weather is not the airline’s fault, but the law says it is their responsibility.”

Issue: 7683 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll