header-logo header-logo

25 February 2022
Issue: 7968 / Categories: Features , Aviation
printer mail-detail

Airline strikes: extraordinary circumstances?

73190
Lee Finch & Ann-Marie O’Neil examine the high threshold for determining which events are outside an airline’s control
  • Industrial action by an airline carrier’s employees touching on their conditions of employment did not amount to an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ for the purposes of Art 5(3) of Regulation (EC) 261/2004.
  • Where flights are cancelled as the result of such strikes, carriers are liable to pay compensation to the affected passengers.
  • Involved consideration of CJEU decisions which had been issued after the end of the implementation period.

Ryanair recognised unions for the first time in December 2017. Subsequently, unions in multiple jurisdictions commenced negotiations with Ryanair. The Irish union, Fórsa, made 11 demands in relation to the seniority structure among Irish pilots. Ryanair argued that these demands could not be satisfied as they would compromise its business model and ability to operate as a low-cost airline. As a result of the failed negotiations, pilots and cabin crew employed by Ryanair went on strike in July, August and September 2018.

The strike caused the cancellation of multiple

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll