header-logo header-logo

Aggravated trespass: Keep off the grass

07 October 2022 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7997 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Health & safety , Public
printer mail-detail
96618
Pitch invaders beware: Neil Parpworth examines the aggravated trespass offence on the field of play
  • Under s 68(1) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, aggravated trespass occurs where the trespasser impacts upon any lawful activity underway on the land in question, including through intimidation, obstruction or disruption.
  • A recent case which saw a YouTube prankster enter the pitch during a test match at The Oval cricket ground was found to fall squarely within the scope of a s 68(1) offence, with the claim that it was done for entertainment purposes proving no defence.

While we ordinarily think of trespass as being a civil law matter, under s 68(1) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (CJPOA 1994) it is a summary offence to trespass on land. The ‘aggravated’ nature of the offence, as determined by the intervention of Parliament, relates to its impact on a lawful activity which is being engaged in on the land at the time that the trespass occurs.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll