header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
06 September 2007 / Beverley Flynn , Navdeep Gill
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Agent payouts

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

The legal protection offered to commercial agents continues to be contentious, say Beverley Flynn and Navdeep Gill

Commercial agents have received legal protection since the mid 1990s by virtue of the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/3053) (the regulations). In general terms, the regulations apply to any self employed agent who has continuing authority to negotiate the sale or purchase of goods on behalf of a principal. The regulations do not apply to unpaid agents or those whose activities are considered to be secondary.
One of the most contentious aspects of the regulations has been the right of commercial agents to claim compensation in certain circumstances upon termination of the relationship.

There have been two recent cases which have dealt with different aspects of the regulations. The first, Crane v Sky In-Home Service Ltd and another [2007] EWHC 66 (Ch), [2007] All ER (D) 220 (Jan), looked at the application of the secondary test and whether an agent’s activities fell outside of the regulations as a result of those activities being secondary.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Tightening the screws on JCT terminations
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
NLJ this week: Old rules, fresh warnings in employment law
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
NLJ this week: The rise of the ‘ChatGPT client’ rattles the profession
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
NLJ this week: Surrogacy children caught in succession gap
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
NLJ this week: Online safety law at a crossroads
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll