header-logo header-logo

01 October 2009 / Jacqueline Renton
Issue: 7387 / Categories: Features , Family , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Age of consent?

Jacqueline Renton reports on the human rights’ approach to non-consensual marriage

Forced marriage is a fundamental violation of an individual’s human rights, namely the right to marry, pursuant to Art 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

Women and men, young and old, healthy and disabled, are forced into marriage every year in this country.

Forced marriages are a breach of an individual’s human rights and also lead to a catalogue of other abuses of human rights—domestic violence, rape, genital mutilation and even murder—thus encompassing: Art 3 (prohibition on torture or inhumane or degrading treatment); Art 4 (prohibition on slavery or servitude and forced labour); Art 5 (right to liberty and security of person); Art 8 (right to respect for private and family life); and Art 17 (probation on abuse of rights).

With respect to murder, these “honour based” killings occur as a result of an individual “dishonouring” or “shaming” the family by refusing to marry the individual chosen for him/her or leaving the forced marriage for another, unsuitable individual.

A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll