header-logo header-logo

Aero Club business rate reversal

09 October 2014
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Upper Tribunal overturns President’s landmark decision

A landmark decision on business rates has been overturned by the Lands Chamber (Upper Tribunal). 

In the case, which involved West London Aero Club, the Valuation Tribunal had held that once it had given its decision on the rateable value, that value couldn’t be amended by a valuation officer (VO) even where the officer believes he is correcting an error (regarding the size of a hangar, in this case). The airfield relied on the principle of res judicata or issue estoppel to argue that the officer was not entitled to ignore or impugn the tribunal’s decision.

Ruling in the airfield’s favour, the Tribunal President, Graham Zellick QC considered that “to countenance the valuation officer’s argument would be subversive of the rule of law, an affront to justice, repugnant to the statutory framework”. On appeal, however, the Lands Chamber has reversed the President’s decision ( Valuation Office Agency v West London Aero Club [2014] UKUT 0291 (LC)). It held that res judicata did not apply and a valuation officer can alter a rating list when he becomes aware of a material change in circumstances because he is under a duty to maintain an accurate list. Giving his judgment, Martin Rodger QC said: “A mistake of fact made by the Valuation Tribunal need not be perpetuated.”

Richard Jones, a property consultant who advised the airfield, commented that the Upper Tribunal decision was based “purely on the legalities” of the VO’s actions and powers.

“It also took into account a previous Valuation Tribunal ruling and the impact of this on the VO’s ability to alter the 2005 rating list. However, no consideration was given to the correctness or otherwise of the confirmed overall rateable value in light of comparable properties, nor to any quantum value reduction in relation to the increased areas of the hangars,” he added.

Issue: 7625 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll