header-logo header-logo

Advocate General drops holiday pay bombshell

27 July 2017 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7756 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Could gig economy workers have a right to claim backdated holiday pay? Charles Pigott reports

  • Advocate General Tanchev has given an opinion which could open the way to substantial claims for backdated holiday pay from gig economy workers.
  • This new approach would provide an added incentive for employers to get their workers’ employment status right at the outset of the relationship.

The Advocate General’s opinion in King v the Sash Window Workshop C-214/16 would put the onus squarely on employers to provide an ‘adequate facility’ for the exercise of the right to take paid annual leave under the Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC (WTD).

The opinion was given on 8 June 2017, in response to a request for a reference from the Court of Appeal. That followed an appeal by Mr King from the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal [2015] IRLR 348. Mr King had been working as a commission only salesman since 1999. He had been categorised as self-employed, and had refused a new contract as an employee on different terms

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll