header-logo header-logo

Adverse possession: Boundary matters

08 October 2020 / Caroline Shea KC , Gavin Bennison
Issue: 7905 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
28862
‘Reasonable belief as to boundary?’: Caroline Shea QC & Gavin Bennison report on adverse possession under the Land Registration Act 2002

In brief

  • The facts of Dowse v Bradford.
  • Paragraph 5(4): the boundary condition.
  • Reflection and implications.

Most property lawyers will know that the law of adverse possession of registered land changed fundamentally, albeit prospectively, when Sch 6 to the Land Registration Act 2002 (the Act) came into force on 13 October 2003. As explained by Mr Justice Fancourt in Dowse v City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council [2020] UKUT 0202 (LC), [2020] All ER (D) 112 (Jul) at [10], the Act:

‘replaced the partly common law and partly statutory regime for adverse possession in the case of registered land and introduced a new statutory regime, based on the common law concept of adverse possession of land. In the context of registered land, the change… is contained within Schedule 6 to the Act.’

One of the challenges of practice in this area is that one

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll