header-logo header-logo

ADR: Just in time for Early Neutral Evaluation?

24 July 2020 / Suzanne Rab
Issue: 7896 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR , Mediation
printer mail-detail
24104
Professor Suzanne Rab explains the pros & cons of Early Neutral Evaluation, & offers some practical advice
  • Gives practical advice on appointing an evaluator and other ENE matters.
  • The author has witnessed an increase in ENE in the context of COVID-19, which can be arranged quickly and conducted remotely.

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a method of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). It is a flexible way to resolve disputes without the parties having to engage in full-scale litigation. Like other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, including mediation, one of the main attractions of ENE is the flexibility it offers to resolve disputes at comparatively less cost and in a timely manner. It may also be conducted without a physical hearing. These factors have contributed to renewed interest in ENE as the social distancing and economic uncertainty connected with the pandemic continues to be felt.

What is ENE?

ENE has evolved to mean different things: first, a voluntary option and latterly a court-sanctioned process. It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll