header-logo header-logo

Adoption without borders?

25 September 2009 / Ruth Cabeza
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Ruth Cabeza considers the changing landscape for international adoptions

The case of Re A (A Child) [2009] EWCA Civ 41, 3 All ER 479 considered how the law can facilitate a child’s adoption, by prospective adopters who live outside this jurisdiction.

Readers who are familiar with domestic adoption will know that an adoption order can only be made in this country to prospective adoptive parents domiciled in this jurisdiction and who have lived for not less than a year at the time of issue. That is a problem for people who live elsewhere, but who wish to adopt a child living here. Such people need to adopt the child in their own country.

However, to protect children from slavery and child trafficking and to promote their welfare, English law does not permit the casual movement of children, out of this country for the purpose of adoption overseas. Section 84 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (ACA 2002) does, however, facilitate the lawful removal of children from the UK for the purpose of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll