header-logo header-logo

25 September 2009 / Sarfraz Khan
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Added protection

More people are now potentially classed as disabled & so entitled to protection

Elizabeth Boyle worked for SCA Packaging Ltd (the company) in Northern Ireland from 1969 until 2002. In 1975 she experienced voice problems caused by vocal nodes, which recurred in 1981 and 1992. She has subsequently followed a strict voice management regime to avoid recurrence.

In 2000, a new manager threatened to remove the partition separating the office where Mrs Boyle worked from the stock control room. She feared the impact this would have in managing her health condition. The company took occupational health advice, but insisted the partition should go.
Mrs Boyle presented disability discrimination claims to the Northern Ireland industrial tribunals (NIIT). Further claims of discrimination, victimisation and unfair dismissal after she was made redundant were consolidated.

The legislation

The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) primarily provides rights to, and prohibits discrimination against people who are themselves defined as disabled. This includes people who have had a disability in the past, though non-disabled people are protected from victimisation and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll