header-logo header-logo

01 July 2010
Issue: 7424 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Action required on data breaches

Employers need to take greater steps to tackle data protection breaches, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has warned.

Employers need to take greater steps to tackle data protection breaches, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has warned.

More than 1,000 Data Protection Act breaches have been notified to the ICO since November 2007. The majority of breaches are due to human or technical data, for example, staff disclosing data to the wrong people. The ICO is therefore urging organisations to ensure staff are adequately trained in the handling of personal data, and there are clear security and disclosure procedures in place which can be properly implemented and complied with.
On 6 April, the ICO was given new powers to fine organisations up to £500,000 for serious data protection breaches.

Tom Morrison, partner, commercial and IP, Rollits LLP, says: “In tough economic times businesses are understandably keen to find ways to save costs. 

“It is important that the key decision makers within private businesses and public sector organisations are able to assess the risks associated with cutting back on training. The savings achieved will quickly pail into insignificance if a lack of training results in a data protection breach. The ICO points to its ability to issue fines, however it seems that the greater risk remains that of long-term damage to an organisation’s hard won reputation.”
 

Issue: 7424 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll