header-logo header-logo

12 July 2024 / Georgina Squire , Camilla Pratt
Issue: 8079 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR , Mediation
printer mail-detail

A seismic shift in approach to mediation

181418
Mandatory ADR is here to stay, write Georgina Squire & Camilla Pratt
  • In Churchill, the Court of Appeal set new standards for court-ordered mediation, allowing a stay of proceedings in some situations.
  • The Civil Procedure Rules Committee is currently looking at a CPR rule change to reflect Churchill and give the courts greater powers to force parties to mediate their disputes.

There have been many discussions on the topic of mandatory alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and it seems to be an issue that is here to stay, with the courts moving further towards compelling parties to mediate. This is particularly relevant in light of the increasing costs of legal proceedings and proportionality concerns being at the forefront of the judiciary’s mind. We see regularly at costs management conferences the courts’ desire to look for ways to reduce costs. They are also battling with an ever-present backlog and concerns about wasted resources in the civil justice system in England and Wales.

The Civil Justice Council addresses

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll