header-logo header-logo

Leasehold reform: a move too far?

26 April 2024 / Shabnam Ali-Khan
Issue: 8068 / Categories: Opinion , Property , Leasehold , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail
169194
Government proposals to introduce radical reform in the leaseholder’s favour will have a huge impact on practitioners when acting for landlords, says Shabnam Ali-Khan

The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill is currently working its way through Parliament. It is proposing some radical leasehold reforms heavily in the leaseholder’s favour. These include significant changes to the landlord’s ability to recover costs when leaseholders exercise their legal rights to enfranchise or extend their leases for flats and houses. Before we delve into the somewhat complex proposals, it is useful to have an overview of the current position.

Current position

The Leasehold Reform Act 1967 governs the rights of qualifying tenants to acquire the freehold or a 50-year lease extension of their house. Pursuant to s 9 of the 1967 Act, the landlord is entitled to recover their reasonable costs in relation to most aspects of the claim, including investigating the right to acquire or extend, as well as the conveyancing and the valuation costs. The Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll