header-logo header-logo

A matter of life & (assisted) death

09 May 2025 / David Locke
Issue: 8115 / Categories: Opinion , Health & safety , Human rights
printer mail-detail
217912
Unworkable & unethical? David Locke unpicks the flawed drafting of the End of Life Bill

The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is a monumentally poor piece of drafting, unbecoming of the issue which it seeks to address. If we assume the point of principle is decided in favour of permitting ‘assisted dying’, the Bill proposes a framework which, insofar as it is comprehensible, is both unworkable and unethical. The following issues need to be addressed by Parliament.

Self-administration

If enacted in its current form, the Bill will make it permissible for a doctor to assist a person to ingest or otherwise self-administer the substance which will bring about the end of life; but it will not be legal to actually administer it. There is a modest attempt made to expand on this: it will be lawful for a doctor to ready the substance for administration; to ‘prepare a medical device’ to enable self-administration; and to ‘assist [the patient] to ingest or otherwise self-administer the substance’.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll