header-logo header-logo

A bumpy ride ahead for Google?

19 November 2021 / David Greene
Issue: 7957 / Categories: Opinion , Collective action , Privacy
printer mail-detail
64414
Google and its detractors suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, as David Greene reports

Last week was an action-packed week for Google Inc on the swings and roundabouts of the judicial process; winning in the Supreme Court against a consumer campaigner seeking to bring a class action for an estimated four million iPhone users, but losing to the European Commission in the General Court of the European Court of Justice. Both decisions are of heightened significance for the legal community; closing the door on one aspect of domestic class actions but opening another door to many years of litigation for Google and its regulatory detractors.

Lloyd v Google ([2021] UKSC 50)

Richard Lloyd, a consumer campaigner, brought a claim against Google after Google agreed to pay hefty fines to the US Federal Trade Commission in relation to the misuse of customers’ data through its DoubleClick Ad software. Claims followed in the courts with a US class action and a claim here by three individuals (Vidal-Hall v Google).

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll