header-logo header-logo

14 August 2008
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News , Damages
printer mail-detail

£4.3m landmark compensation for injured Man United star

Insurance premiums set to rise after club and player admit liability

A decision to award a former trainee footballer, whose career was ended by a negligent tackle, £4.3m will have wide ranging ramifications for all levels of the game, experts say.

Manchester United trainee Ben Collett suffered a double fracture of the lower leg following a tackle by Middlesbrough’s Gary Smith in a reserve match in May 2003. In court both Middlesbrough and Smith admitted that the tackle was “negligent” leaving Mrs Justice Swift to assess the level of compensation that Collett should receive from Middlesbrough’s insurers.

Richard Hartley QC of Cobden House Chambers in Manchester says the ramifications of the judgment will be felt across all levels of football: “Clubs at both amateur and professional standing will need to examine carefully their third party insurance liability cover as cases like this will inevitably become more commonplace.”

Hartley continues: “Individual professionals, even many Premier League stars, have cover which is inadequate, particularly in light of the judgment. In practical terms we deal with an awful lot of these cases where amateur players lose their earnings because of events that happen on a Sunday morning, but why should they put up with it?”

Greg Rollingson, senior partner at Rollingsons Solicitors, says that proving liability is key to any similar claim.

“To succeed in an action for damages, an injured professional footballer would need to show that, on the balance of probabilities, that his opponent would have known that there was a significant risk that if he tackled in the way he did, the other player would be seriously injured,” he says.

Rollingson continues, “Essentially he would have to show that his opponent had been guilty of dangerous and reckless play to establish liability. Football clubs may now find that their insurance premiums increase in light of this judgment”.

Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News , Damages
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll