header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 2 December 2022

02 December 2022
Issue: 8005 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Contempt

Cuciurean v Secretary of State for Transport and another [2022] EWCA Civ 1519, [2022] All ER (D) 60 (Nov)

The King’s Bench Division dismissed the appellant’s appeal against his previous order as of right. This was in regard to the judge sentencing the appellant to 268 days’ immediate custody for contempt of court. He also fined him £3,000. The appellant was committed for contempt of court for 12 breaches of an injunction protecting HS2 land. The court held, among other things that it was not appropriate to fine the appellant on the particular facts of that case. He had no assets and was the subject of a term of immediate custody. The fine was therefore quashed. As to the methodology by which the judge calculated the overall term, they did not consider it appropriate. It was appropriate for that court to review the overall sanction. Overall, they found that the period of 268 days’ imprisonment was not excessive or unreasonable.


Criminal

R v Elmi [2022] EWCA Crim 1428, [2022]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll