header-logo header-logo

Can information disclosed in family proceedings be released to particular individuals or bodies, asks David Burrows

David Burrows breaks the seal on Kim v Morris

Pre-nuptial agreements: where are we now, asks Anna Heenan

Geraldine Morris advises a cautious approach to clean-break orders

Amanda Melton argues against pigeonholing families within the law

Jonathan Herring examines the approach to the dissolution of gay marriage

Ancillary relief v confiscation proceedings: what takes priority, asks Sarah Wood

Philip Waller traces the changing face of family law

David Burrows notes the complexities that surround the severance of joint tenancy

Rebecca Carlyon notes the intricacies of beneficial interest relating to a foreign divorce

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll