header-logo header-logo

web_mark-solon

Mark Solon

Chairman

Mark Solon, chairman, Wilmington Legal & founder, Bond Solon (mark.solon@wilmingtonplc.com; www.wilmingtonplc.com)

Chairman

Mark Solon, chairman, Wilmington Legal & founder, Bond Solon (mark.solon@wilmingtonplc.com; www.wilmingtonplc.com)

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR
Legal privilege: with rights come responsibilities, as Mark Solon explains
A sigh of relief for expert witnesses: Mark Solon welcomes the High Court’s judgment in Radia v Marks
Mark Solon narrates a tale of two experts
Mark Solon addresses some common issues when drawing up terms & conditions for experts
The new Master of the Rolls promises civil justice shake-up. But what about the expert witnesses, asks Mark Solon
Mark Solon reports on the first university certified training course for experts giving evidence in Scottish courts
Are expert witnesses getting paid? Mark Solon investigates
Expert witnesses at a conference with counsel—a practical guide—compiled by Mark Solon
Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll