Jonathan Pratt
In Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489, [1954] 3 All ER 745 the dispute revolved around the potential sale of a bungalow, which Mr Ladd wished to buy from Mr Marshall.
Matthew McCahearty & Jonathan Pratt applaud the flexibility of Wrotham Park damages
Eleanor Morgan & Jonathan Pratt explore the doctrine of benefit & burden
Matt McCahearty & Jonathan Pratt recommend keeping Pt 36 offers under review
Jonathan Pratt provides a statistical analysis of recent trends in City litigation
Damages or injunctions? Willie Manners & Jonathan Pratt report
In billing disputes is the client always right? asks Jonathan Pratt
A cross undertaking in damages can prove costly, says Jonathan Pratt
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Muckle LLP—Rachael Chapman
Sports, education and charities practice welcomes senior associate
Ellisons—Carla Jones
Partner and head of commercial litigation joins in Chelmsford
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=3d1684d4_1)
Freeths—Louise Mahon
Firm strengthens Glasgow corporate practice with partner hire
