header-logo header-logo

jane_ching_nls

Jane Ching

Professor

Jane Ching, professor of professional legal education, Nottingham Law School (www.ntu.ac.uk/nls/)

Professor

Jane Ching, professor of professional legal education, Nottingham Law School (www.ntu.ac.uk/nls/)

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

Jane Ching reflects on two decades in legal education & looks to the future

Jane Ching explores the importance of language within legal education

Jane Ching & Natalie Byrom grapple with the present & future demands of legal services education

Nick Jarrett-Kerr suggests routes towards the expansion of educational horizons for lawyers

Jane Ching explores how the changing legal landscape will affect lawyers’ approach to CPD

Is becoming a paralegal a safer move to qualification? Jane Ching investigates

Jane Ching looks at making the most of, & going beyond, CPD

Continuing, professional, developmental...Jane Ching debates the true meaning of CPD

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll