header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

Edward Heaton

Principal associate

Ed Heaton, associate, Mills & Reeve LLP (edward.heaton@mills-reeve.com; www.mills-reeve.com)

Principal associate

Ed Heaton, associate, Mills & Reeve LLP (edward.heaton@mills-reeve.com; www.mills-reeve.com)

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

Pre-nups: the search for certainty continues, says Ed Heaton

Edward Heaton considers a surprising case that illustrates how difficult it is to run a successful add-back argument

A recent appeal court ruling highlights the flaws in a fault-based divorce system, says Ed Heaton

Family practitioners must always have one eye on the court’s overriding objective, says Ed Heaton

Just how easy is it in practice to apply the principle of compensation, asks Ed Heaton

Ed Heaton explores the rights of cohabitants

Ed Heaton reviews the current child support system & outlines developments over the last 12 months

Is Collaborative Family Law a real option or just a passing craze, asks Edward Heaton

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll