Daniel Warents is a barrister at XXIV Old Buildings (Xxiv.co.uk). Daniel was counsel acting for the appellants in the El-Husseiny appeal to the Supreme Court. Newlawjournal.co.uk
Daniel Warents is a barrister at XXIV Old Buildings (Xxiv.co.uk). Daniel was counsel acting for the appellants in the El-Husseiny appeal to the Supreme Court. Newlawjournal.co.uk
Joseph Tendler & Daniel Warents contemplate the future of s 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 after the most recent judgment in the El-Husseiny litigation
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?