header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

Anthony Connerty

Barrister

Anthony Connerty is a barrister in practice in the Chambers of Stephen Hockman QC  at 6 Pump Court, Temple, London EC4. He is Head of the IDR Group and has acted in international arbitrations and mediations in cities around the world under the Rules of major arbitral and mediation institutions (anthony.connerty@6pumpcourt.co.uk and anthonyconnerty@idrgroup.org).

 

 

 

 

Barrister

Anthony Connerty is a barrister in practice in the Chambers of Stephen Hockman QC  at 6 Pump Court, Temple, London EC4. He is Head of the IDR Group and has acted in international arbitrations and mediations in cities around the world under the Rules of major arbitral and mediation institutions (anthony.connerty@6pumpcourt.co.uk and anthonyconnerty@idrgroup.org).

 

 

 

 

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR
Anthony Connerty assesses the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on international arbitration
"The authors are to be congratulated on producing a guide to international arbitration which will be of great use not only to the busy practitioner but also to those new to the field"

“The Compendium is an immensely useful book that can be recommended both to the beginner and to the seasoned practitioner”

"A valuable handbook for lawyers and others involved in commerce on the African continent"

"Professor William Park, president of the LCIA, describes the authors of this collection of essays as 'an all-star set of contributors'"

Anthony Connerty provides a guide to the 2012 revision of the rules of CIETAC

This is a significant book from two experienced international arbitrators, with sections contributed by specialists in this complex field.

Anthony Connerty reports on how ADR has helped deal with the fallout from the collapse of Lehman Brothers

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll