header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

Andrew Otchie

Barrister
Andrew Otchie is a practising barrister at 12 Old Square and is also qualified as a New York Attorney. He is a member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and the Honorary Secretary of the Commonwealth-in-England Barristers’ Association.
Barrister
Andrew Otchie is a practising barrister at 12 Old Square and is also qualified as a New York Attorney. He is a member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and the Honorary Secretary of the Commonwealth-in-England Barristers’ Association.
ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

Andrew Otchie reflects on the approach to granting an anti-anti suit injunction

Andrew Otchie discusses the technicalities & legal aspects of enforcing a judgment from a Commonwealth jurisdiction

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll