header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 162, Issue 7524

24 July 2012
IN THIS ISSUE

Squibb Group Ltd v Vertase FLI Ltd [2012] EWHC 1958 (TCC), [2012] All ER (D) 151 (Jul)

Beck Interiors Ltd v Classic Decorative Finishing Ltd [2012] EWHC 1956 (TCC), [2012] All ER (D) 152 (Jul)

Gittins v Serco Home Affairs [2012] EWHC 651 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 162 (Jul)

SG (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; OR (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 940, [2012] All ER (D) 146 (Jul)

Bourges-Maunoury and another v Direction des services fiscaux d’Eure-et-Loir: C-558/10 [2012] All ER (D) 153 (Jul)

Fenn report recommends a fuller review of the road traffic accident process

Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34, [2012] All ER (D) 172 (Jul)

Shergill and others v Khaira and others [2012] EWCA Civ 983, [2012] All ER (D) 167 (Jul)

Why it’s time to link in!

Which way is the legal services market going, asks Richard Moorhead

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll