header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 157, Issue 7255

11 January 2007
IN THIS ISSUE

Criminal Justice Act 2003 (Commencement No 14 and Transitional Provision) Order 2006 (SI 2006/3217):

The Employment Rights (Increase of Limits) Order 2006 (SI 2006/3045):

The media’s obsession with itinerant sex offenders misses more problematic flaws within the notification scheme, says Alisdair Gillespie

District Judge Stephen Gold with an antidote to seasonal excess—new tribunals

R (Meredith) v Harwich Magistrates’ Court [2006] All ER (D) 45 (Dec):

Victoria von Wachter explains how Keen restricts the scope of possible challenge to discretionary bonus decisions

In brief

Ian Smith explains why 2006 went out with a bang

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
back-to-top-scroll