header-logo header-logo

08 December 2023 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8052 / Categories: Features , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Zander’s reflections: 8 December 2023

150572
Michael Zander KC on how he helped to derail Lord Carter’s proposed sentencing reforms

In 2008, although I had never previously written about sentencing, I did my best to help derail proposals for reform of sentencing put forward by Lord Carter of Coles in his report, ‘Securing the Future— Proposals for the Efficient and Sustainable Use of Custody in England and Wales’ (December 2007), which I described in print as ‘a contender for the title of Worst Report of Recent Years’ (‘Which way to go?’, 158 NLJ 869).

Carter’s report recommended the introduction of a US-style structured sentencing framework based on a grid aimed at a drastic reduction of judicial discretion. There had been no call for evidence, no consultation paper and the report made no reference to the considerable literature on the subject. No one on the Sentencing Advisory Panel or the Sentencing Guidelines Council had been asked for their opinion. There was no list of those who had been consulted.

Carter’s report recommended the setting up

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll