header-logo header-logo

20 July 2012 / Andrew Birtles , Rob Hines
Issue: 7523 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Before you leap...

istock_000012887565small_4

Rob Hines & Andrew Birtles examine cohabitation law in Scotland & its future in England & Wales

In Gow (FC) v Grant (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 29 the Supreme Court handed down a landmark judgment on cohabitation law in Scotland. Perhaps just as significant were the comments made by Lady Hale in her concluding remarks, in which she issued a clear rallying call for the creation of similar laws in England and Wales.

Mr Grant, aged 58, and Ms Gow, aged 64, began a relationship in 2001. In December 2002, Grant asked Gow to move into his property and Gow agreed to do so, on the condition that they became engaged.

When the parties met they each owned their own home and were in employment. Six months into the cohabitation Gow, with Grant’s encouragement, sold her Edinburgh home for £50,000, the proceeds being used to discharge her debts and to fund the parties’ living expenses. By 2009, the value of Gow’s former flat had increased £38,000 above the sale value. In 2003,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll