header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
20 March 2014 / David Burrows
Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

A work in progress (2)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

In his exclusive online series David Burrows continues to puts the new family court under scrutiny & assesses its ability to deliver justice

These articles on the family court were planned at the turn of the year. It was thought then—not unreasonably at that stage—that a family court, intended to be in operation in April 2014, would have well-defined regulatory contours by March 2014.

We have primary legislation in place: Crime and Courts Act 2013, Sch 10 brings in the family court, and the Children and Families Act 2014 has royal assent (13 March 2014). For the family court, secondary legislation is still limited to two sets of Family Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2014 (SI Nos 524 and 667 both of 2014) laid before Parliament respectively on 10 and 18 March 2014. We have various “views” from the window of Sir James Munby P’s office (chambers). In All change (again), Geraldine Morris speculated as to what is to happen with the new court (eg its structure, children proceedings, court fees, marital agreements (a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Is inequality undermining trust?
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
NLJ this week: Freemasons ruling backs police transparency over privacy claims
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
NLJ this week: Right to grieve marks ‘major shift’ in employment law
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
NLJ this week: AI privilege battles expose risks
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
NLJ this week: Experts warned—AI use must be transparent
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll