header-logo header-logo

05 May 2011
Issue: 7464 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Work-life balance matters in-house

In-house lawyers are so overworked that they would sacrifice a fifth of their salary in exchange for a four-day working week.

Two-thirds of 2,882 corporate counsel polled by legal recruiter Laurence Simons said the loss of income (representing about £16,500 of an average £82,500 salary) would be worth the extra day.

They claimed the use of smart phones and other communications technology was blurring the boundaries between work and rest, as their evenings and weekends were taken up with e-mails and other work-related communications. Carriers of smart phones had 13% more e-mails than those without, and spent two-and-a-half times longer checking their correspondence.

Naveen Tuli, managing director of Laurence Simons, said the increase in remote working has created an appetite for a “three-day weekend” because of the amount of work people are required to do outside the office. 

“They also feel technology allows them to work more flexibly, as well as remotely, so the four day week has become more viable and would allow people to fit their work around their interests.”

Tuli says the survey results indicate that people are beginning to feel more secure in their jobs. “Employers now need to look at whether their current employment terms are flexible enough to satisfy this demand,” he adds.

Issue: 7464 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll