header-logo header-logo

22 May 2024
Issue: 8072 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Work doesn’t pay: civil legal aid providers at breaking point

Civil legal aid work is loss-making for the majority of providers, according to a devastating research paper published this week

The study, ‘Research on the sustainability of legal aid’, was commissioned by the Law Society and conducted by Frontier Economics with housing and family legal aid lawyers in not-for-profits and private practice. It found 82% of providers were making a loss from civil legal aid.

More specifically, all housing legal aid providers in the sample were loss-making from their civil legal aid work, including all private sector solicitors offering housing work.

It found 47% of family legal aid providers were loss-making. All not-for-profit providers sampled in both areas of law were making a loss.

One lawyer told the researchers: ‘We simply can’t afford to do private family legal aid.’ Another said: ‘It’s an exercise in withering on the vine. We’re all quite old. I look at it and think, in ten years’ time there won’t be any legal aid work.’

Civil legal aid fees have not increased since the 1990s and were cut in 2011 by 10%. According to the Law Society, this represents a real terms reduction of 90% since 1996.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘This research reveals an untenable situation where reductions in fee levels by successive governments mean fee-earning staff cannot even recover the costs of providing legal aid, let alone generate a profit to make the organisation sustainable.

‘Those who remain in the market are only able to do so by cross-subsidising from other areas and relying on the goodwill of staff to regularly work overtime, leading to real difficulties with recruitment and retention—especially at senior levels of the profession. Others are taking the decision that legal aid work is simply no longer viable and exiting the market, leaving areas of the country with no legal aid provision at all.

‘This is just not sustainable and is resulting in massive market exit, with advice deserts growing across the country. It is a significant concern when a city the size of Liverpool struggles to sustain housing provision and the family courts are flooded with litigants in person. These figures provide clear evidence of the reasons why.’

Emmerson urged the Ministry of Justice, which is currently conducting the Civil Legal Aid Review, to set fee rates at a ‘realistic and sustainable level’.

Issue: 8072 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll