header-logo header-logo

13 November 2008
Issue: 7345 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Winding-up foreign companies

Janna Purdie looks at the principles courts apply when determining whether or not to exercise their winding up jurisdiction

Winding up foreign companies

Refs: OJSC ANK Yugraneft, Millhouse and Sibir [2008] All ER (D) 311 (Oct)

In a judgment of interest in the current economic climate, the Commercial Court has set out the principles applicable in determining whether or not it may exercise its jurisdiction to wind-up a foreign company in the English courts.

Facts of the case

Refs: OJSC Oil Company v Abramovich [2008] All ER (D) 299 (Oct)

The case links through to the OJSC Oil Company v Abramovich case in which judgment was handed down on the same day. That case effectively decided the outcome of this one but the judge considered that he should continue to deal with it as it was a free standing application.

In this case, the applicants sought an order to set aside the appointment of the provisional liquidator of Yugraneft, a declaration that the court would decline to exercise its insolvency jurisdiction and an order dismissing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll