Wills—to dispense, or not to dispense: that is the question

27 October 2020 / Debra Burton

Issue: 7908 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate

With the government retrospectively amending the law to allow for the video-witnessing of wills during the COVID-19 pandemic, is the next step the introduction of dispensing powers & is it a good thing, asks Debra Burton

In brief

What could the future hold?
Should England and Wales ‘get with the times’?
Certainty: protecting the testator.

It’s rather surprising that since it was enacted, the Wills Act 1837 has remained largely unchanged. The Wills Act provides that the formalities for a valid will are that:

it must be in writing;
it must be signed by the person making it in the presence of two independent witnesses; and
the witnesses must each sign it in the presence of the person making it.

Now the government has taken the first step in relaxing the will writing rules, is it the last?

What could the future hold?

The Law Commission’s 2017 Consultation Paper ‘Making a Will’ (https://bit.ly/31yAcBD) highlighted several areas where will making could be modernised

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Wills—to dispense, or not to dispense: that is the question

In brief

What could the future hold?
Should England and Wales ‘get with the times’?
Certainty: protecting the testator.

It’s rather surprising that since it was enacted, the Wills Act 1837 has remained largely unchanged. The Wills Act provides that the formalities for a valid will are that:

it must be in writing;
it must be signed by the person making it in the presence of two independent witnesses; and
the witnesses must each sign it in the presence of the person making it.

Now the government has taken the first step in relaxing the will writing rules, is it the last?

What could the future hold?

The Law Commission’s 2017 Consultation Paper ‘Making a Will’ (https://bit.ly/31yAcBD) highlighted several areas where will making could be modernised

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Motor commissions & fiduciary duties

The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings

NLJ this week: The power of Interpol red notices

Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Approach with caution post-Mazur

Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?

Philip Sales is selected as next Deputy President

Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year

Tax shock ahead for partners?

Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget

Error message

Wills—to dispense, or not to dispense: that is the question

In brief

What could the future hold?

In brief

What could the future hold?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington