header-logo header-logo

15 July 2016 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7707 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Willing & able

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason examine recent wills & probate decisions

  • Davies and another v Davies : an appeal of a proprietary estoppel decision.
  • Hamilton v Hamilton : High Court considers the question of whether assets held in a Liechtenstein Foundation in fact formed part of the deceased’s estate such as to be distributed under the terms of his will.

Davies and another v Davies [2016] EWCA Civ 463, [2016] All ER (D) 09 (Jun), deals with an appeal of a proprietary estoppel decision. The claimant (C) worked intermittently on her parents’ dairy farm throughout her adult life. She did so for little or no pay, working long and anti-social hours and giving up a well-paid career. C did so on the expectation that she would inherit all or part of farm and/or farm business. Her parents made various promises to this effect throughout the period 1985 to 2008.

C made a successful claim based on proprietary estoppel, although the court at first instance rejected her claim for the whole farm but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll