header-logo header-logo

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Who benefits?

Paul Hewitt and Paola Fudakowska report on beneficial ownership

In (1) Antony Stow (2) Richard Stow (3) Alhaji Ahmed v (1) Zoe Stow (2) Comissioners for HMRC (3) Estate of Edward Stow (4) Gareth Stow [2008] WTLR 1103 the third defendant (E) and the third claimant (K) were business colleagues. K settled assets on trust (the B Trust) and later used those funds to create a further six settlements (the N settlements). HMRC contended that the B Trust was a sham and E had provided the assets, therefore making E the settlor of the N settlement for tax purposes. HMRC issued notices of determination of tax on the trustees of the N settlement in the amount of £20m.

In 2005, E died leaving an estate of about £5m. E's wife, the first defendant (Z), was indicating an intention to claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 against both E's estate, and the trustees under s 10. The first and second claimants, (A) and (R), and the fourth defendant (G) were trustees of the N

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll