header-logo header-logo

09 February 2012
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Whipping up a storm

Government & ABI “stoking” compensation culture myth

A leading personal injury lawyer has accused government ministers and the Association of British Insurers of “stoking” the myth of the compensation culture.

A “stream of prejudice” against personal injury (PI) claimants has given rise to measures such as the Jackson reforms which, he argues, will make it more difficult for injured workers to claim compensation, and the government’s reining in of whiplash claims.

Writing in NLJ, Patrick Allen, senior partner at Hodge, Jones & Allen, says: “It seems that it is not the consequences of the banking collapse which is holding back the economy but British businesses that ‘every day battle against a tide of risk-assessment forms and face the fear of being sued for massive sums’.

“In fact, precisely the opposite is true in terms of the effects on the economy, as you can find a few clicks away on the Health and Safety Executive’s website. In 2010-11, 26.4 million days were lost due to work-related illness and workplace injury. 1.2 million people were suffering from an illness which they believed was caused or made worse by their work. Workplace injuries and ill health (excluding cancer) cost society an estimated £14bn in 2009-10.”

Allen notes the Transport Select Committee wants the “bar raised” on the proof required for a whiplash claim. He asks whether the committee may be “overreacting”.

The Ministry of Justice announced last week that the implementation of the Jackson reforms, which are likely ro reduce the number of PI claims, will be delayed until April 2013. The legal aid provisions of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill have also been delayed until that date.

NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan, of City Law School, says: “The postponement is welcome. It is essential, given the enormity of the reforms, that measures are thoroughly prepared. The current Pt 36 mess is due to implementation with undue haste in 2007.”

Issue: 7500 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll