header-logo header-logo

Whiplash reforms delayed

18 July 2018
Issue: 7802 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has pushed back its controversial whiplash reforms by a year.

The reforms would introduce a tariff system for whiplash claims, ban settlements without medical evidence, and raise the small claims threshold to £5,000. An online portal would be introduced for the claims. Implementation had been due by April 2019. 

However, the MoJ confirmed this week that full implementation is now scheduled for April 2020.

Vidisha Joshi, managing partner of Hodge Jones & Allen, said: ‘The proposed changes are unnecessary; the data shows that fraudulent claims have been decreasing as well as the overall number of claims. The government should use the delay as an opportunity to take stock, and properly examine this data and the impact on innocent people who need advocates to act in their best interests.’

Issue: 7802 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll