header-logo header-logo

Where in the world?

12 August 2016 / Nick Chapman , Donny Surtani
Issue: 7711 / Categories: Features , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail
istock_86478385_medium

Donny Surtani & Nick Chapman examine the increasing predictability of jurisdiction in EU tort cases & the impact of Universal Music International Holding BV v Schilling

  • Under the rules that control jurisdictional issues for civil claims within the EU, the general position is that a defendant should be sued in the member state in which they are domiciled. However, where a claim is brought in tort, the claimant is also able to issue proceedings in either the place where the damage occurred or the place of the event that gave rise to the damage.
  • The allowances given to tort claimants have the potential to create difficulties where the damage is purely financial loss. More specifically, previous decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) have raised the possibility of a claimant being able to pursue a claim in a jurisdiction that has very weak links to the subject-matter of the dispute, purely on the basis that that jurisdiction is the location of the claimant’s bank account, which felt the alleged loss.
  • The
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll