header-logo header-logo

15 May 2014 / Sarah Moore
Issue: 7606 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Where there’s smoke…

web_moorer

Will the issues of e-cigarettes & plain packaging re-ignite tobacco litigation, asks Sarah Moore

For the first time in 20 years an advertisement from a large tobacco company has appeared on British TV screens.

The advert, released during February, depicts a healthy-looking young man and woman propelling themselves through a cloud of smoke while the audio assures viewers of, “satisfaction for vapers”. The product being marketed is a brand of e-cigarette called “Vype” and the company behind the campaign is a subsidiary of the tobacco giant British American Tobacco (BAT). Meanwhile, following the conclusion of an inquiry led by Sir Cyril Chantler, the government is under renewed pressure to legislate for plain packaging for old style cigarettes. It appears that while one marketing door may be closing for “big tobacco” another is being left wide open.

The rationale for this Janus-faced policy is rooted in the positioning of e-cigarettes as safer and healthier alternatives to conventional cigarettes. It also takes advantage of a regulatory gap which will continue to exist until 2016 when e-cigarettes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll