header-logo header-logo

When couples turn sleuth…

17 January 2025 / Henry Venables
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce , Technology
printer mail-detail
203846
Candid camera? Henry Venables highlights the increasing sophistication of spyware in family cases

Spying in spousal or family relationships has always occurred to some extent, but the increasing affordability and accessibility of spyware, the evolution of technology, and blurred lines around acceptable and unacceptable forms of tracking are all factors that have contributed to the rise in spying in recent years. There has been a significant uptick in the percentage of cases in which one spouse is spying on the other—from approximately 20% in my firm in 2022 to around 40% in 2023.

Traditionally, clients would provide audio recordings or CCTV footage, but as technology continues to develop, the type of equipment used in a family law context is constantly changing. Now, we often see cases involving dash cams, car trackers and even secret cameras hidden in soft toys.

We’ve also recently been made aware of an iPhone charging device containing a micro-transmitter that enables spyware to be deployed and data to be accessed from a phone on charge. While this

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The threat of section 21 ‘no fault’ eviction was banished this week, after the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 passed into law
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll