header-logo header-logo

12 February 2016
Issue: 7686 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

What is the price of law?

Costs lawyer warns commercial legal services clients are wising up to increasing costs

Clients are wising up to excessive costs, a leading costs lawyer has warned in the wake of a report that found Magic Circle partners billing £1,000 per hour.

The Centre for Policy Studies report, The Price of Law, produced by Jim Diamond, says hourly rates for a partner at a top London firm are now at “the highest level ever recorded”. This means “those seeking to comply with UK legal procedure are forced to pay extremely high costs to do so—high enough to restrict access to law, particularly for smaller business clients for whom bills can be prohibitive”.

The report points out that there is a lack of transparency since average hourly rates are not published online, and that “the remarkable similarity in the rates charged by each of the Magic Circle law firms suggests a shortage of competition between them”. The report makes no suggestion of collusion between the firms, but does take aim at the “outdated and unsustainable” concept of the billable hour.

Billable hours also came under fire last month from Lord Justice Jackson, who called for fixed fees for civil claims valued at up to £250,000.

Responding to Diamond’s report, Sue Nash, chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL), says: “I believe there is a real ‘wind of change’ among purchasers of commercial legal services who are beginning to realise that their legal spend is increasing and/or buying them less.

“There are smaller London-based firms probably every bit as competent but charging up to 50% less and then there are market-disruptors like Riverview Law. Costs lawyers have the experience and skills to analyse legal spend for commercial purchasers and to help ensure that they are getting value for money.

“However, we must not forget that these rates do not reflect the work done—or fees charged—by the vast majority of solicitors across the land. As for those solicitors and junior barristers doing legal aid work, with some hourly rates as low as £26 (and the absolute maximum for the most rare and complex cases is about £140 an hour), the vast majority can only dream of being able to bill £1,000 in a week let alone an hour.”

 
Issue: 7686 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll