header-logo header-logo

29 March 2018
Issue: 7787 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

 

Arbitration

Allianz Insurance plc (Formerly Cornhill Insurance plc) and another v Tonicstar Ltd (on its own behalf and behalf of the other corporate members of Lloyd’s Syndicates 62, 1861 and 2255) [2018] EWCA Civ 434 [2018] All ER (D) 125 (Mar)

A Queen’s Counsel who had practised as a barrister specialising in the field of insurance and reinsurance for more than ten years satisfied the requirement in cl 15.5 of the Joint Excess Loss Committee, 1997 Edition. In so doing, the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, overruled an unreported decision that had been followed in the High Court.

Building contract

Dacy Building Services Ltd v IDM Properties LLP [2018] EWHC 178 (TCC) [2018] All ER (D) 124 (Mar)

The claimant company’s claim to enforce the decision of an adjudicator in a construction dispute succeeded, as its submission that an oral contract had been formed was preferred. The Technology and Construction Court stressed the court’s general approach in respect to adjudication enforcement and held that the adjudicator had been correct to find that a binding oral

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll