header-logo header-logo

A WEE DRAM

10 January 2008
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Whisky regulations

Scotch whisky could get regional protection to combat counterfeiting and passing off. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs is consulting on draft proposals to strengthen the definition of Scotch whisky and hopes to introduce legislation in June. The proposed regulations would: introduce protected regional names which can only be used if the whisky has been made wholly in that region; ensure that all Scotch whisky is wholly made and matured in Scotland; and provide that if a product uses the name of a particular distillery it must also be made at that distillery. The consultation is open until 25 March and is available at www.defra.co.uk.

 

Issue: 7303 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll